|
||
|
Played Archives for minigame threads |
What?!?!? -- Animal Derby Game |
Login or Register now to see less ads. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
What?!?!? -- Animal Derby Game
I went to play Animal to get some sunflowers seeds on my nonmember and guess what?
If they continue to do stuff like this, I am going to quit~ : Angry: |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
That's pretty silly. Even sillier, I've been beaten by non-members on turtles, so it doesn't make sense to waste diamonds on a different mount.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Oh my! They DID that?!?! That's is TERRIBLE! That makes me SO mad!! I wish there would be ONE website where there were no members, and everyone could have/use the same things!! I am so sorry that happened Isabelle! It makes me mad too.
Love, An angry Scarlet |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Just WHY are they making things all DIAMONDS DIAMONDS DIAMONDS?! You could at least let non-members use the member animals with INGREDIENTS! The only good thing is that they're letting them at least try the member animals... but with DIAMONDS! The non-members probably won't even be able to afford a member animal with the amount of diamonds they get now and about everything in the Hollow being all about DIAMONDS.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I don't play that game often, but did they get rid of the turtle? Do non-members HAVE to use a diamond to select from those animals? If so, then that does seem a little unfair. They should still have the option to play free, even if they might be at a disadvantage.
If the turtle is still a free option then I don't think it's really a problem. They've given non-members the option to play as those animals now, where as before they didn't have a choice. I don't necessarily see how this is a bad thing... |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
The turtle it's in the game For me its a good change, what if a no member always wanted to try other animal? Now that no member can try it without buy a membership, and just with a diamond. And nobody its going to obligate to use diamonds to play or something its just for the fairy that want to use it
And yes they are trying to make money of everything now, but I like to see the bright side, that means more and more years or pixie hollow. I see other games closed, and a lot of people saying that the will give money to help the game but always was to late, so for me its ok. THATS RIGHT!!!!!! As I said I dont understand some complains xD |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Absolutely right, Serendipity. But I still don't know why they do DIAMONDS! Do they still have everyone's memberships counting money for them or not? -_-
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
*Brakes giant block of metal*
UGHHH!!!! I HATE THIS! *SCREAM* IF THEY'RE SO MONEY HUNGRY, THEN WHY DON'T THEY DO THIS FOR A TOTALLY DIFFERENT WEBSITE OF THEIR OWN!? Ugh... *brakes concrete ground* I'm getting SO tired of this, heres what I want:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
(Hehe, thank you Electro. I have a feeling someday non members will be able to personal craft as long as they have diamonds... why is Disney so money-hungry? )
It doesn't really hurt, since some fairies pay for diamonds, but if a new fairy spends diamonds on that and then realizes she would rather have spent them on clothes, that would just be sad. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
i am sorry but the site would not make money because no one would pay for membership because everyone would get everything and it would be silly to pay.And i am sure no one wants that. What would be the difference between non-members and members if non-members could buy tailor bake etc. Pixie hollow wouldn't make enough money to keep the site running and will eventually shut down.In the end It is just business. and i agree with Rin, if they allowed to use the turtle then what is the difference? it is the same as before but now they have the option of trying another animal if they want, it is still same. Last edited by bayberry bubbleweather; 09-08-2012 at 08:45 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
This doesn't seem like a very big deal, however I am worried about the young kids who play the game and have their parents buy them Diamonds. They might use up all their allowance without a second thought, and then what will they do?! Yikes, soon enough we will see Diamond prices on Talent Games, and then when more trophies are released, players will pay to be up on the Leaderboard!
Goodness, Pixie Diamonds seem to be the solution to everything nowadays. "Too impatient to wait for your plant to grow? Buy Diamonds! Don't want to work hard on earning ingredients? Buy Diamonds! Tired of losing games? Buy Diamonds!"
__________________
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I never noticed that change! I haven't checked yet... And, now, they let Non-Members pay their Diamonds to get the Members-only animals? In my opinion this is one of the most ridiculous ideas I've ever heard in my life!
~Infinity Magicspirit |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Thats CRAZY! There is noooooooooo way I will spend my diamonds to ride a different animal!!!
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
You guys, we have to keep in mind that this IS a business. The whole objective of the game is to make more money for Disney Co. I honestly don't mind, even though I'm not a member nor can I afford Diamonds. Lets all take a deep breath, and calm down. Okay?
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I think we all know that Pixie Hollow is a game business that needs money like any other business. The point of this matter is it's simply incredibly stupid for a non-member to waste what precious pixie diamonds they have on a different mount! Right after they did this change I played Derby on a turtle mount and went against another non-member (I think she was a non-member, she was wearing the all-white arrival-day outfit) who chose a rabbit. And I won on turtle. That player most likely wasted her PD. I can totally see fights happening over this, like non-members fighting and accusing others of cheating, because the turtle out-raced a Diamond-purchased mount.
In my opinion, diamonds should be saved to buy a pretty top, or a house item, or an animal friend. It's common sense. Unless that particular fairy is super rich and can afford it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|